Spencer Museum of Art The University of Kansas

Conversation IV: Constuction/Destruction

Graffiti

Paint is meant to restore beauty and/or update the appearance of an existing construction, but is a building any different after a new coat of paint has been applied? Has it been reconstructed, so to speak, since the change of its appearance?

Is this also the case when graffiti has been applied to a surface? Does graffiti reconstruct its medium?

Typically graffiti is sprayed on older, run-down walls in inner-city areas, ones that have withstood the test of time and wear marks and scars indicative of their age. Do the multi -colored paints of graffiti writers rejuvenate these aged walls? As these vivid and raw styles of urban art coat the surface of these walls, are new buildings created; are they reconstructed?

Now sites of contestation, these walls they take on a new identity and a new role in society. No longer are they the remnants of an old business or the blemished walls of a lonely alley, they are now caught up in the process of artistic creativity. The walls might now express individuality or rebellion as opposed to their past notions of practicality. This transition gives the surface a new identity and function in our everyday lives. No longer is the wall ignored; it is negotiated by each passing commuter. Its message, if the artist chooses to give it one, will be experienced by many passers-by, regardless of their intention to do so. In this way graffiti is a form of reconstruction: the writer’s coating effectively lends to the existing surface a new identity and a new role in society.

Ben Ford Coldham
KU Student/Graffiti Artist
bcoldham@gmail.com

Join the Conversation


All posts will be moderated by Museum staff before posted
Join the Conversation